Urology
Volume 75, Issue 5 , Pages 1193-1198, May 2010

Fournier's Gangrene: Overview of Prognostic Factors and Definition of New Prognostic Parameter

  • Bulent Erol

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Bulent Erol, M.D., Department of Urology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak 67600 Turkey
  • ,
  • Altug Tuncel

      Affiliations

    • Ministry of Health, Ankara Numune Research and Training Hospital, Third Department of Urology, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • Volkan Hanci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Husnu Tokgoz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Abdulkadir Yildiz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Bulent Akduman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Eksal Kargi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Zonguldak Karaelmas University Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
  • ,
  • Aydin Mungan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey

Received 7 May 2009; accepted 4 August 2009.

Objectives

To identify the prognostic factors and the new parameters that might predict a worse outcome in nonsurvivors compared with survivors of Fournier's gangrene (FG) and evaluated the validity of the Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI) in patients with FG.

Methods

The medical records of 18 patients with FG who were treated and followed up in our clinic were reviewed. Data were collected in terms of medical history, symptoms, and physical examination findings. The biochemical, hematologic, and bacteriologic study (aerobic and anaeorobic wound cultures) results at admission and at the final evaluation, the physical examination findings, the timing and extent of surgical debridement, and the antibiotic therapy were also recorded. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and FGSI were evaluated stratified by survival.

Results

The results were evaluated for 2 groups: those who survived (n = 14) and those who did not (n = 4). The admission FGSI score was 5.00 ± 2.91 (range 0-10) for survivors compared with 13.5 ± 2.62 (range 9-15) for nonsurvivors (P = .001). The CCI score was 3 ± 1.5 in survivors and 7 ± 2.2 in nonsurvivors (P = .008). Individual laboratory parameters such as hypomagnesemia, hemoglobin, hematocrit, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, and the heart and respiratory rates were associated with a worse prognosis. In addition, a FGSI >9, rectal involvement, colostomy diversion, and a high CCI were associated with high mortality.

Conclusions

Low magnesium levels might be a new parameter for a worse prognosis. High CCI and FGSI scores might be associated with a worse prognosis in patients with FG. A FGSI threshold of 9 was a predictor of mortality during the initial assessment.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0090-4295(10)00179-2

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.090

Urology
Volume 75, Issue 5 , Pages 1193-1198, May 2010