Volume 76, Issue 4 , Pages 1061-1065, 15 March 2010
Postoperative Nomogram Predicting the 9-Year Probability of Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy Using Radiation Dose as a Prognostic Variable
Purpose
To report a multi-institutional outcomes study on permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) to 9 years that includes postimplant dosimetry, to develop a postimplant nomogram predicting biochemical freedom from recurrence.
Methods and Materials
Cox regression analysis was used to model the clinical information for 5,931 patients who underwent PPB for clinically localized prostate cancer from six centers. The model was validated against the dataset using bootstrapping. Disease progression was determined using the Phoenix definition. The biological equivalent dose was calculated from the minimum dose to 90% of the prostate volume (D90) and external-beam radiotherapy dose using an α/β of 2.
Results
The 9-year biochemical freedom from recurrence probability for the modeling set was 77% (95% confidence interval, 73–81%). In the model, prostate-specific antigen, Gleason sum, isotope, external beam radiation, year of treatment, and D90 were associated with recurrence (each p < 0.05), whereas clinical stage was not. The concordance index of the model was 0.710.
Conclusion
A predictive model for a postimplant nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence at 9-years after PPB has been developed and validated from a large multi-institutional database. This study also demonstrates the significance of implant dosimetry for predicting outcome. Unique to predictive models, these nomograms may be used a priori to calculate a D90 that likely achieves a desired outcome with further validation. Thus, a personalized dose prescription can potentially be calculated for each patient.
Prostate cancer, Brachytherapy, Radiotherapy, Nomogram, Outcome
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Conflict of interest: R.S. acts as a consultant for Bard. B.D. acts as a consultant for Oncura Inc. and Calypso Inc. and has a financial interest in Tomotherapy Inc. N.S. is a co-owner of Prologics, LLC. No other conflicts.
PII: S0360-3016(09)00469-6
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.031
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 76, Issue 4 , Pages 1061-1065, 15 March 2010
