International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 53, Issue 3 , Pages 720-728, 1 July 2002

Radiation oncologists in 2000: demographic, professional, and practice characteristics

  • Yasmin Cypel, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Yasmin S. Cypel, Ph.D., Research Department, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr., Reston, VA USA 20191. Tel: (703) 648-8984; Fax: (703) 264-2443
    • Research Department, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
  • ,
  • Jonathan H. Sunshine, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Research Department, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
  • ,
  • Barbara Schepps, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Committee on Radiologist Resources, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, USA
    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University Medical School, Box G, Providence, RI, USA
    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA

Received 8 October 2001; received in revised form 22 January 2002; accepted 29 January 2002.

Abstract 

To describe the demographic, professional, and practice characteristics of radiation oncologists, emphasizing comparisons to data from a similar 1995 Survey.

In spring 2000, we surveyed 603 randomly selected radiation oncologists by mail, using a one-page questionnaire—455 responded. We weighted responses to make answers representative of all radiation oncologists in the United States.

Approximately 45% of post-training, professionally active, radiation oncologists were <45 years old and 22% were women. Forty-two percent of radiation oncologists in training were women. Thirty-three percent of radiation-oncology-only practices were solo practices. The greatest percentage of post-training, professionally active, radiation oncologists were in nonacademic private radiation oncology practices. Fifty-three percent of post-training, professionally active, radiation oncologists reported that their workload was about right. Eighteen percent of individuals 60–64 years old and approximately two-thirds of those ≥65 years old were not working (retired). The full-time equivalency of those aged 55–74 fell by 12 percentage points between 1995 and 2000.

Most demographic, professional, and practice characteristics remained relatively constant between 1995 and 2000, with the exception of work status patterns. Radiation oncologists reported a more balanced workload than that reported by diagnostic radiologists. The surplus of radiation oncologists, which was predicted in the mid-1990s, was not demonstrated.

Keywords:  Demographics, Practice trends, Work trends, Practice groups, Retirement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0360-3016(02)02758-X

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 53, Issue 3 , Pages 720-728, 1 July 2002